Shoe Review: Newton’s Distance U

Disclaimer: I’m a slow runner, averaging a 9:30 mile during my shorter runs and around 11:00 on our 13.1′s.  So, my shoe choices are not based on performance in a speed or race-winning capacity.

After wearing the hell out of my New Balance 1400′s and starting a training cycle for another half marathon, I needed new shoes.

Ginger and I had tried the Newton Distance U’s on at the expo prior to the Women’s Half Marathon, and we’d both fallen in love.  We decided they’d be our next shoe – and they were. She bought them first; I followed a week later when we started ramping up our longer runs again.

That isn’t before I read every single review I could find of these shoes though.  I’m obsessive like that.

samesies!

Yes, we’re dorks.  But we’re proud of it.

I’m a supporter of the minimal shoe movement.  I have no idea why.  Yes, I’ve read all the literature on both sides. I just love the idea of feeling a little more in tune with the surface on which I’m running. Not barefoot in-tune, mind you, but a little more natural.

The Newton’s fit the bill, but with a few caveats.

First of all, I love the colors.  The Distance U comes in both fluorescent greenish yellow and this bright pink color. We both chose pink, which resulted in more comments from passing runners that we liked, I think.

The unique thing about these shoes is that the forefoot has Newton’s patented forefoot lugs – little rectangles of rubber that help you spring off your forefoot.  They almost force you to run on your forefeet rather than strike on your heels.  We had to practice a little to get used to running like that – but it felt good once we got the hang of it.

They’re ridiculously light and extremely breathable – perfect for Florida runners.  I loved how they felt and looked – which is why I gave them so much time when I should’ve abandoned them.

Another factor that influenced my purchase was their heel-forefoot drop of only 2mm.  The Distance U’s are considered a “Performance Racer” and their slogan is, ““PR in a box.” My New Balance’s had warmed me up for a more minimal shoe, and I thought I was ready.

Against my better judgment, my first run in these was a 10 miler.  No blisters, super comfortable, no problem.  I was running roughly 20-25 miles/week at this point, so felt like I had enough warm-up to break these in before our next long run.

After my third run, my heel and leg where so sore, I could hardly walk.  I had no idea what the problem was, but attributed it to the new shoes,  to too much too soon.  I went back to my very expired New Balance’s for our long run that weekend – and while that probably wasn’t the best move, my heel didn’t feel quite as bad.

After two days of rest, I headed back out for a few shorter runs in the Newton’s again, and worked my way up to the longer weekends – all the while dealing with intermittent and sometimes crippling soreness in my Achilles.

Now, I know that it was the shoes that caused the injury; it certainly didn’t hurt that we were ramping up mileage. But I do think that my body just wasn’t ready for that low level of stability, that my calves weren’t strong enough to handle it.  I kept thinking that my muscles would strengthen as I ran more miles in them, but it never happened.  I was doing strength training and running a lot (for me) – but my body never got used to these shoes.

In the end, I realized I needed a shoe with a little more stability and an Achilles injury requires a more substantial heel/toe drop (I had to buy heel pads before I had time to get new shoes). I’d run far too many miles in these before realizing my mistakes though – and it sidelined me for almost a month.

Quick Likes:

  • Colors!  Most of Newton’s shoes have great, bright colors.
  • Really light.
  • Great minimalist shoe, but still built for racing.
  • Breathable, cool mesh fabric – great for hot weather running.
  • Forefoot lugs and special sole technology is supposed to last 800-1000 miles.

Quick Dislikes:

  • More minimal than I was ready for.
  • Not a lot of right/left stability.
  • Fairly expensive ($130 average).
  • Run small – order a half size up.

I really liked how these shoes looked and felt, but unfortunately, my body did not.

Have you ever run in Newton’s? They seem to be a love/hate brand. What are your thoughts?

4 thoughts on “Shoe Review: Newton’s Distance U

  1. Pingback: Shoe Review: Brooks PureFlow | Running on Ipsum

  2. I am planning to buy these shoes but I am worried about my pf –I have a recurrent one. Just recently my pf is getting worse so I tried the forefoot strike – my calves were so sore the next day and my pf was worse. Do you think buying these shoes wouldn’t be a good idea?

    • I don’t think I would buy them if I was dealing with any heal pain at all, and especially not with PF. In my experience, you need more support, not less. These weren’t right for me at all.

  3. Andi, I disagree with you. I’ve watched my running partner bounce back from PF after dealing with it for 2 years once she made the switch to Nike Free Run’s from a stability shoe. The bulk of a stability shoe is in the heel, which forces you to land more heel to toe, than forefoot. Newton’s encourage forefoot landing, which when broken in correctly, can benefit you in the long run. I think your mistake rests solely on jumping into a 10 mile run straight away rather than building your muscles up slowly. Newton’s have done wonders for my form and my pace, but I cannot stress enough the importance of breaking them in slowly, and by slowly, I mean no more than a .50-1 mile at a time for the first few weeks. They do take a bit to get used to the change in style, especially if you’re heel striker.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge